Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to expand their knowledge and improve their understanding. Yet this isn't what happens in global warming skepticism. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet uncritically embrace any argument, op-ed piece, blog or study that refutes global warming.
So this add on gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?
This add on is very much article aware - it is very much based on the content you see on your screen. And it supports two major pieces of functionality;
1. The ability to see what other climate experts believe are problems with the content on the page you're looking at, and
2. ( in order to support 1. ) The ability to report that the content has particular issues